Archive for the ‘movies’ Category
Hello Darkness
A friend had pointed this film festival out to me, a special horror movie run just before Halloween. It was to be shown at ACMI, which has become a frequent haunt of mine, with their ‘Freaky Friday’ features. With an interest in most of the movies showing at this festival, we bought one of the four movie passes and picked the following:
Paranormal Activity
There has apparently been a significant amount of hype around for this movie, but I hadn’t heard too much about it other than a website petition for the movie to be shown in certain towns (a rather successful marketing trick). This showing was sold out, but I had low expectations – a hand-held self-filmed movie? I couldn’t help but think of the Blair Witch Project. Thankfully this turned out much better. It seemed to last for a long time, but only because it was so tense all the way through. Despite this the characters created some natural comedy, but not enough to override the tension, particularly later on. I found myself sucked into the story and about half way through I had to remind myself that it was only a movie and it wasn’t real.
I won’t give too much away, but the story was great, if lacking in detail in places and the action was simple and spectacular. The ending I saw (one of three according to most websites) was good, but I felt added too much comedy to it rather than fear. The other two endings that I have heard about sound better, but whether they were executed well is another matter.
The Last House on the Left
This was the recent remake of the original from the 1970s, and I saw it only half an hour after ‘Paranormal Activity’, so obviously my expectations were fairly high. As it was fairly different, it wasn’t hard to expect different, and there was definitely a comedic gore factor to it, as well as some social and moral issues lightly tossed in.
As I haven’t seen the original, I can’t say how it compares, but I can say that it was a good movie. The acting was fairly good (especially the ‘bad guys’), and the special effects of blood and guts was fairly realistic for the most part. It was a scary movie in a different way, because there wasn’t too much tension building (and what there was was short-lived). The fear came in the believing that people could act that way, and that revenge could be that easy.
As I said, I wasn’t scared by this one, but it was still a good horror movie.
Sheitan
The first of two foreign language movies, I was quite looking forward to this one. I’ve seen some French movies, and quite enjoy their quirkiness, but was unsure whether that would continue into the horror-style movies. It certainly did. This movie definitely did not disappoint – there was tension, violence, sex and generally strange things. It was fantastic.
I feel the camera work is also worth a mention, with different techniques being applied to bring out the different moods throughout the movie. This was a strong point for me.
Overall there was a certain element of humour throughout this movie, right until the end, and it helped to confuse the audience. The moments of humour would come at unexpected points, or be so closely linked to the fear that it gave a very uneasy feeling. I thoroughly enjoyed this movie.
Haute Tension
The last movie of my four, and another French one. A quick look at IMDB indicated that this would be different to the oddness of ‘Sheitan’ and a more traditional horror slasher gore-fest; it certainly didn’t let down on the last count!
The story was a little predictable, with an inkling of the ending in the back of my mind. However, the execution was fairly good, with the build up, the action and a prolonged conclusion all being of high quality. The acting was hit and miss at times, but the soundtrack, camera work and blood made up for this for the most part. The plot was also missing in parts, but I still thought it worked.
Probably the weakest of the four I saw, but going by the high quality, it was definitely not a bad movie.
After re-reading this, I feel that I’m being faithful to my ‘resolution’ of sorts to watch more movies!
Second Anniversary
On September 1st it passed the second year I’ve been in Melbourne. As pointed out in my last post, I’m quite settled here and enjoying everything.
Anyway, the weekend before last, I took a day-trip out to Mt Buller to see Australian snow for the first time. After doing some investigative work, the best deal I could find was through the tourist agency ExtraGreen for a bus from the city and back. After a last-minute upgrade, we ended up on a good quality bus on our way out of the city at 6am. Unfortunately, the weather wasn’t exactly pleasant, and as we headed to higher ground, the rain started to fall. It continued all day, and all but ruined the day.
If it hadn’t been raining, we could have hired some snow shoes and gone for a hike, or completed the Gnome Roam (as it was, I could only find one gnome on the clock tower before giving up), or even just had a better look around the village. Unfortunately, after some lunch and some more skipping between buildings, we headed up Summit Road to a pub and spent some time playing Buckhunter! The snow barely got a look in.
I was almost grateful to be on the bus going home after the wasted day there. As we pulled into Mansfield (where people had hired snow-gear), the rain cleared and there was some beautiful late afternoon light. As we had some time to kill, we went for a quick walk around nearby and took some photos before the clouds covered the rest of the sky.
Other than that, nothing too big has been happening for me. This Friday past, I had free tickets to the Comedy Club, where I got to see Adam Rozenbachs as MC, with Terry North and Lehmo. Terry North is an English comedian that I’ve seen on two other occasions, and he still has no new material. Thankfully Lehmo and Adam Rozenbachs both made up for this and it was an enjoyable night.
I’ve been quite busy at work recently, but I’ve also been to the movies a few times. I saw District 9 a few weeks ago. This was a refreshing movie. The fact that it was South African, with little American influence, was quite noticable. The acting was a little iffy at times – with the main character barely developing at all. Apart from that, the special effects and costumes were impressive, and I liked the movie.
The other movie I saw was Quentin Tarantino’s Inglorious Basterds. Now this movie has had a fair amount of press, and I was looking forward to it. It didn’t disappoint. The violence was plentiful, and there was more than enough dialogue, but overall I felt that it worked. The in-depth dialogue and speeches were, at times, overkill, but added to the rest of the action, it was fantastic. The acting was fantatic, with mostly unknown (to me at least) actors. The character of Col. Landa, played by Christoph Waltz, was particularly impressive.
As the Melbourne Silver Mine’s Unsensored 09 exhibition closes on Wednesday, I highly recommend heading down if you get the chance. It sounds like it has been quite successful, with a number of people passing through and some of the pieces have sold (multiple times!) My image hasn’t sold, but I was aiming to bring it home to adorn our wall instead. It certainly would have been nice to make a sale, but after agonising over the images, I decided to hang them just for the sake of hanging, rather than to make money. This is the first time my work has been displayed in public, and I’m quite content just to be able to see my work large and on the wall!
While on the subject of photography, I visited Scienceworks Museum last weekend to see the Star Wars exhibition. Taking my camera and a couple of lenses was the easy bit, but with many of the displays poorly lit and behind glass smeared with children’s fingerprints, getting the photos was a bit harder. I took my still new-ish 40D with my 50mm f/1.8, and by using my adaptor, I also had two Nikon mount lenses – 85mm f/1.4 and 24mm f/2.8. Unfortunately the former of these was of little use in the crowded rooms, but the 24mm was useful on occasion to get some close-ups of pieces.
Unfortunately I didn’t manage to see any more movies at MIFF, but I did see the Whitlams playing at the Corner Hotel last weekend. Their show was quite extensive, with only one support and playing one album in full (Eternal Nightcap). It was a fantastic show with an intriguing crowd. Thankfully, MUFF starts soon, and I should be able to see a few more of those.
Just this weekend, I saw ‘Drag Me To Hell’ as it’s cinema run is finishing. I thoroughly enjoyed this, despite mixed reviews. There were moments where I momentarily cringed and thought it would go down hill, but it managed to redeem itself. The acting, for the most part, was very good, but I felt there were too many ‘jumps’ to be fun. It ended up distracting from the story and acting. On the whole though, it was fantastic. Hopefully this week I will manage to see District 9 too.
While I’m remembering, I never got around to mentioning the latest Harry Potter movie. As a movie, it was fantastic. The darkness, the acting and the effects were all very good and the movie moved along nicely. Obviously, as a comparison to the book, it’s disappointing. Many, apparently unimportant, aspects and scenes were left out, and there were huge chunks missing. Also, the scene of Dumbledore’s death, which could and should have been amazing, was a huge letdown.
Books and movies so far…
1. Blood and Champagne: The Life and Times of Robert Capa – Alex Kershaw
2. American Psycho – Bret Easton Ellis
3. The Call of the Weird: Travels in American Subcultures – Louis Theroux
4. Sense and Sensibility – Jane Austen
5. Slumdog Millionaire – Vikas Swarup
6. The Burn-out Town Of Miracles – Roy Jacobsen
7. 1984 – George Orwell
8. The Book Thief – Markus Zusak
9. Memoirs of a Teenage Amnesiac – Gabrielle Zevin
10. The Historian – Elizabeth Kostova
11. War Trash – Ha Jin
12. Siberia – Ann Halam
Also currently reading “East Of Eden” by John Steinbeck and “A Cork on the Waves” by Halina Robinson.
So although I’m halfway through the year, I’m nowhere near the halfway point of 42 books of last year! Despite this, I haven’t been watching as many movies as I promised myself either.
I have watched some though. I’ve started to watch/re-watch the Star Wars collection (I saw the first three when I was younger but can barely remember them, and never saw the new ones) – which I’m enjoying. I’ve watched the first two of the original trilogy, and am grateful for the refresher.
I saw X-Men Origins: Wolverine at the cinema recently. It was quite disappointing, as I’d heard from many people. The balance of action and character development is poor. The characters and relationships went too far, and the action could have been much better. Don’t get me wrong, it’s much better than a lot of movies out there at the moment, but it could have been as good as the other X-Men movies at least!
Also recently in the cinema, I saw a movie entitled ‘Flesh Gordon’. Now, I haven’t seen the more appropriately titled ‘Flash Gordon’, nor know anything about it. But I loved this movie. The poor recording quality (it’s from the 70s), the lack of technology and budget for the action and the c/d/e/f-grade actors all come together to make a very entertaining Friday evening! It was shown at ACMI in Fed Square, which seems to have a lot of old, odd or local movies showing.
A few weeks back, I saw ‘Deliverance’ at ACMI too, which definitely better than the modern hillbilly movies. I liked that the story followed the characters at the end, and again, the lack of technology and budget just added to the charm.
Anyway, I haven’t been watching as many movies as I could have been, but I am thinking about the ones I see more – as I did with the books I read last year. I mentally review each one in my mind, even if I’m not typing it all up!
Slumdog Millionaire
When the hype surrounding the movie began to build up, I remembered that I had bought the book and decided, as usual, to read that before I saw the movie. Although I’m not one to believe the hype, the movie sounded interesting enough – the story had potential, they were mixing Indian with Western culture and I was interested to see Dev Patel in a role other than a comedic character in Skins.
While reading the book, I thought it was far too simple. The story was obvious and predictable and the language and techniques used were simple. On the other hand, it was a different kind of story to most of those I read – each chapter of his life relating to the answer of a question on the show, and all coming together at the end – it was formulaic but interesting. Overall I wouldn’t have thought very much of the story – it reminded me of Dan Brown in its simplicity and never-ending action! This all changed when I saw the movie however.
The movie was terrible. Characters were poorly formed (although the three ‘ages’ worked well), the story was all but completely changed and even the characters’ names differed from the book. In a movie as it’s own right, I would probably rate it as mediocre. The film score was brilliant and worked well, but scenes weren’t all consistent with those preceding and following. The idea from the book of his telling a story of how he knows the answer to questions was only used very loosely, and many of the questions were changed so that they could leave out entire subplots and characters.
Retrospectively, I now see the book as quite good, with a creative story and good use of characters. It’s simple, but very heartwarming and gives a vague insight into the lives of those that live in the slums for the Western audience. The movie, in comparison to the book, is positively terrible. Even if it were only loosely based, the basis is thrown out the window and Hollywood came in to trample over the remaining values and ideas.
The actors cannot be faulted, as they, for the most part, played their roles spotlessly. The children from the first part were especially great – although the ’scandal’ and media circus now surrounding them is disappointing. Dev Patel was interesting to see in a different role, but for the most part he simply sat there and looked miserable – in my eyes there is much more his character could have done.
I feel bad for dismissing the movie so quickly, as I do like Danny Boyle’s work – Trainspotting and Millions are great movies, probably making it to my top 20 if I had to form a list. However, I think he’s failed on this count and should have stayed clear – if it were more loyal to the book, it may have worked. Granted there are many more aspects to a book, but even the Harry Potter movie/book comparisons are better than this!
Media
I’ve never been a huge fan of the media, particularly tabloids. When I started to read the news as I grew up in England, I was scared by the fact that newspapers such as The Sun and The News Of The World actually had regular readers – I’d always had faith that people were a bit smarter than that.
In recent weeks, the amount of news articles devoted to the bushfires (on The Age website) has been ridiculous. I’m not opposed to hearing about it, but the news has simply been saturated with both straight and human interest articles – with a huge focus on the latter. Thankfully I have the choice of not clicking, and in a lot of cases I haven’t. Human interest stories just become too much – we’re all aware that there have been huge tragedies, and there are fascinating studies of human nature and will, but I don’t have time or interest for it. I stick to the straight stories and get on with it.
Most recently however, the media has given me more cause for concern. The two main websites I read for news are the BBC and The Age – for international and local news respectively. Unfortunately, over the last few days, both websites have had two of the least interesting current stories on their front pages – coverage of the Oscars and Jade Goody’s death.
First up, the Oscars. I’m not wholly up to date with celebrities, movies, actors, directors etc. and this could be the reason why this doesn’t interest me. Or, it could be that everyone knew Heath Ledger would get a posthumous Oscar for The Dark Knight and therefore it should not be a major headline. I know that I’m trying to watch more movies this year (and I’m doing quite well), but the Oscars is such a superficial ceremony, with too much celebrity- and otherwise politics. It simply doesn’t interest me, and I would much rather be reading real news.
Secondly, Jade Goody. Where to start? I did watch the series of Big Brother that she was in – it was the only series that I watched the majority of. I found her fascinatingly stupid – was it an act or should be genuinely impressed she got as far in life as she did? Post-BB however, the media culture took hold of her and propelled her into low-grade stardom with books and TV shows and such (I’ll be honest, I don’t know what she did after BB). Having lived outside of the UK since she had cancer, I missed a fair bit of the story until it was discovered that she’s terminal and her two kids will now be brought up by her ex-con new husband. Sure, sad. But every time I load up a news website, it’s saying something new: ‘Jade Goody plans to marry’; ‘Jade Goody dresses for wedding’; ‘Goody walks down aisle’, ‘BB star and ex-con married’. I don’t feel the need to know all of this, and I’m sure the rest of world doesn’t need to either. But of course, she’s doing it for her kids, right? Making media money to keep the kids and her husband flushed with cash. What a great idea. Show them the true value of life and material possessions, right?
Maybe I missed something growing up, but I just don’t know why people need to know every little detail about the latest ‘celebrity’. I’m as nosy as the next person, but why celebrities? And why ‘news’ written in such tasteless styles? I’d much rather read a well-written biography in years to come rather than the trash that’s around these days. And, for the most part, do.
Leave a Comment
Leave a Comment
Leave a Comment







